#PILLARS OF ETERNITY II PLAY OFFLINE GENERATOR#
Toyota use the ICE engine more often to turn the wheels since it uses a eCVT.Ģ electric motors(1 generator and 1 motor), 1 clutch to connect engine to wheels at high speeds, it is a series hybrid, the engine is primarily used for generating electric energy. I don't know which is the best, but both can work as series hybrid, only at higher speeds they employ different strategies to turn the wheels using the ICE engine. To my understanding, correct me if I am wrong. What differntiates the Toyota hybrid technology from ths Honda hybrid technology?Īre they pretty close, or have a big gap? If so, what are the strong and weak points (or pros and cons)of each? Suzuki is probably happy to receive Toyota's tech as it is superior and more efficient than Suzuki's.
This is something that Toyota pushed to gain economies of scale of hybrid component production in India (some components will be shared with the Innova Hycross, for example the 3cyl engine of the Hyryder Hybrid will be expanded to 4cyl to create a 2.0-litre engine for the Hycross). However it's clear as day that they used Toyota hybrid based on the specs. If you see the D pillar and the bonnet shape all the clues point towards the base being of a Vitara, which I believe is a very good point to start withĪgree with your points regarding the vehicle being based on the Vitara, the Hyryder seemed to share the chassis hardpoints up to the B-pillars with the global Vitara, while the rear is lengthened from the global Vitara to be as long as the S-Cross and other midsize SUVs. įrom the data that is available it looks like a re-engineered Vitara with the Suzuki all grip system and the Suzuki hybrid system and being manufactured at the Toyota plant. In fact I am also have my doubts about the TOYOTA hybrid since Suzuki already has a Hybrid system for the Vitara. Hope the car will undergo crash testing as well so that speculations can be put to rest. I see no issue with that either as S-Cross is a very European vehicle and is unlike the typical Maruti cars sold in the market. Just because some parts are shared with current S-Cross in India, it doesn’t mean that the car is a reworked S-Cross. Secondly, I was under the impression that the Global C platform is also called the TECT platform while the newer modified version is called HearTECT. Maruti Suzuki marketing team mentioned HearTect even for S-Cross petrol since 2020 but various owners have shared photos of the underbody and it is still the same as old S-Cross and is different from cars using HearTect.
As Sri_Tesla points out, it seems to be the Global C or Tect platform and is not built on the HearTect platform. Globally, Suzuki has not used HearTect platform for SX4 S-Cross, Vitara and related cars. Under safety in the Hyryder brochure, it is mentioned as Advanced body structure (TECT body).
0 kommentar(er)
